討論區

(2)參考解答
(2) Prove: $c_1, c_2 \in \mathbb{F}$ 且 $c_1 \neq 0,c_2 \neq 0 \implies c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2$ 不會是 $T$ 的 eigenvector.
若 $c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 $T$ 之 eigenvector 且 $c_1 \neq 0,c_2 \neq 0$,
則 $\exists \lambda \in \mathbb{F}$ s.t. $T(c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2) = \lambda (c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2)$
因 $T$ 為linear,
則$c_1 T(\mathbf{v}_1) + c_2 T(\mathbf{v}_2) = c_1 \lambda \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda \mathbf{v}_2$
$c_1 \lambda_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda_2 \mathbf{v}_2 = c_1 \lambda \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda \mathbf{v}_2$
$c_1 (\lambda - \lambda_1) \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 (\lambda - \lambda_2) \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0}$
因 $\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 linearly independent,
故 $c_1 (\lambda - \lambda_1) = 0$ 且 $c_2 (\lambda - \lambda_2) = 0$
$\because c_1 \neq 0$ $\therefore \lambda = \lambda_1$
$\because c_2 \neq 0$ $\therefore \lambda = \lambda_2$
故得 $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2$ ($\rightarrow\leftarrow$)
故 By contradiction method(反證法)證得.
(3)參考解答
(3) Prove: $\exists c_1,c_2 \in \mathbb{F}$ 且 $c_1 \neq 0,c_2 \neq 0$ s.t. $c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 $T^2$ 之 eigenvector $\implies \lambda_1 = -\lambda_2$.
若 $\exists c_1,c_2 \in \mathbb{F}$ 且 $c_1 \neq 0,c_2 \neq 0$ s.t. $c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 $T^2$ 之 eigenvector,
則 $\exists \lambda \in \mathbb{F}$ s.t. $T^2 (c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2) = \lambda (c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2)$
因 $T$ 為 linear,故 $T^2$ 亦為 linear,
此時,$c_1 T^2 (\mathbf{v}_1) + c_2 T^2 (\mathbf{v}_2) = c_1 \lambda \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda \mathbf{v}_2$
又已知:若 $T(\mathbf{v}) = \lambda \mathbf{v}$,則 $T^k (\mathbf{v}) = \lambda^k \mathbf{v},\forall k \in \mathbb{N}$,
故得$c_1 \lambda_1^2 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda_2^2 \mathbf{v}_2 = c_1 \lambda \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda \mathbf{v}_2$
$\implies c_1 (\lambda_1^2 - \lambda) \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 (\lambda_2^2 - \lambda) \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0}$
又因 $\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 linearly independent,
知 $c_1 (\lambda_1^2 - \lambda) = 0$ 且 $c_2 (\lambda_2^2 - \lambda) = 0$
$\because c_1 \neq 0$ $\therefore \lambda = \lambda_1^2$
$\because c_2 \neq 0$ $\therefore \lambda = \lambda_2^2$
$\therefore \lambda_1^2 = \lambda_2^2$
即 $\lambda_1 = \pm \lambda_2$
但由題意:$\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2$,
故得 $\lambda_1 = -\lambda_2$.
此時,$T^2 (c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2) = \lambda_2^2 (c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2)$
$\therefore$ 對於 $T^2$,此 eigenvector $c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2$ 之 eigenvalue $\lambda = \lambda_2^2 = \lambda_1^2$.
(1)延伸問題
前言:延伸 7.4 的問題,老師今天在上課問如果不限於兩個 eigenvectors,而是更多的 eigenvectors,是否也成立呢?現在就來能證明:
Consider linear operator $T: V \rightarrow V$, 且 $\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \dots, \mathbf{v}_n$ 為 $T$ 之 eigenvectors,其對應之 eigenvalues 為 $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \dots, \lambda_n$.已知:$\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2 \neq \dots \neq \lambda_n$.
Prove: $\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_n$ 為 linearly independent.
① $\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 linearly independent 成立.
② 假設 $\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k$ 為 linearly independent 成立,
若 $\mathbf{v}_1 + \dots + \mathbf{v}_k + \mathbf{v}_{k+1}$ 為 linearly dependent,
則 $\exists c_1, \dots, c_k, c_{k+1}$ 不全為 $0$ s.t. $c_1\mathbf{v}_1 + \dots + c_k\mathbf{v}_k + c_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_{k+1} = \mathbf{0}$ —— ①
$T(c_1\mathbf{v}_1 + \dots + c_k\mathbf{v}_k + c_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_{k+1}) = \mathbf{0}$
$c_1T(\mathbf{v}_1) + \dots + c_kT(\mathbf{v}_k) + c_{k+1}T(\mathbf{v}_{k+1}) = T(\mathbf{0})$
$c_1\lambda_1\mathbf{v}_1 + \dots + c_k\lambda_k\mathbf{v}_k + c_{k+1}\lambda_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_{k+1} = \mathbf{0}$ —— ②
① $\times \lambda_{k+1}$ : $c_1\lambda_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_1 + \dots + c_k\lambda_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_k + c_{k+1}\lambda_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_{k+1} = \mathbf{0}$ —— ③
② $-$ ③ : $c_1(\lambda_1 - \lambda_{k+1})\mathbf{v}_1 + \dots + c_k(\lambda_k - \lambda_{k+1})\mathbf{v}_k = \mathbf{0}$
由假設,$\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k$ 為 linearly independent,
$c_1(\lambda_1 - \lambda_{k+1})\mathbf{v}_1 = \dots = c_k(\lambda_k - \lambda_{k+1})\mathbf{v}_k = \mathbf{0}$
即 $c_i(\lambda_i - \lambda_{k+1})\mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0}, \forall i = 1, \dots, k$
又前提假設:$\lambda_i \neq \lambda_{k+1}$ 且 $\mathbf{v}_i$ 為 $T$ 之 eigenvector,故 $\mathbf{v}_i \neq \mathbf{0}$.
$\therefore c_i = 0, \forall i = 1, \dots, k$, 即 $c_1 = \dots = c_k = 0$,
將其代入 ③ : $c_{k+1}\mathbf{v}_{k+1} = \mathbf{0}$
又 $\mathbf{v}_{k+1} \neq \mathbf{0}$,
故 $c_{k+1} = 0$.
此時,$c_j = 0, \forall j = 1, \dots, k+1$ ($\rightarrow\leftarrow$)
$\therefore \mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_{k+1}$ 為 linearly independent.
因此,By 數學歸納法,$\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_n$ 為 linearly independent.
(3)其他參考解答(採用反證法與(2)之結論)
若 $\lambda_1 \neq -\lambda_2$,又題意:$\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2$,故可知 $\lambda_1^2 \neq \lambda_2^2$
又因 $T(\mathbf{v}_1) = \lambda_1 \mathbf{v}_1, \quad T(\mathbf{v}_2) = \lambda_2 \mathbf{v}_2$,
故 $T^2(\mathbf{v}_1) = \lambda_1^2 \mathbf{v}_1, \quad T^2(\mathbf{v}_2) = \lambda_2^2 \mathbf{v}_2$
若 $c_1, c_2 \in \mathbb{F}$ 且 $c_1 \neq 0, c_2 \neq 0$,
By (2) 之結論,知 $c_1\mathbf{v}_1 + c_2\mathbf{v}_2$ 不會是 $T^2$ 之 eigenvalue.
故 By Contrapositive method (反證法) 證得.
(1)參考解答
由題知,$T(\mathbf{v}_1) = \lambda_1 \mathbf{v}_1$,$T(\mathbf{v}_2) = \lambda_2 \mathbf{v}_2$,其中 $\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2$.
(1) Prove: $\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 linearly independent.
若 $\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 linearly dependent,
則 $\exists c_1, c_2$ 不全為 $0$ s.t. $c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0}$ —— ①
$T(c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \mathbf{v}_2) = T(\mathbf{0})$
$c_1 T(\mathbf{v}_1) + c_2 T(\mathbf{v}_2) = \mathbf{0}$
$c_1 \lambda_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda_2 \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0}$ —— ②
① $\times \lambda_1$ : $c_1 \lambda_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + c_2 \lambda_1 \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0}$ —— ③
③ $-$ ② : $c_2 (\lambda_2 - \lambda_1) \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0}$
此時,由 $\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2$ 且 $\mathbf{v}_2$ 為 $T$ 之 eigenvector,
可知 $\lambda_2 - \lambda_1 \neq 0$ 且 $\mathbf{v}_2 \neq \mathbf{0}$,故知 $c_2 = 0$.
$c_2 = 0$ 代入 ① : $c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{0}$
又 $\mathbf{v}_1$ 為 $T$ 之 eigenvector,
故 $\mathbf{v}_1 \neq \mathbf{0}$,
得 $c_1 = 0$,
此時 $c_1 = c_2 = 0$ ($\rightarrow\leftarrow$)(注:與假設的$c_1, c_2$ 不全為 $0$ 矛盾)
$\therefore \mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2$ 為 linearly independent.